Page 8 of 10

The Global Response

AMR has climbed from a laboratory concern to the floor of the UN General Assembly. Here is what the world's institutions are actually doing — and where the gaps remain.

The 2024 UN political declaration: first hard targets

On 26 September 2024, at only the second UN General Assembly high-level meeting ever devoted to AMR, world leaders adopted a political declaration containing — for the first time — concrete global targets:

−10%reduction in the 4.95M annual AMR-associated deaths by 2030 (vs 2019 baseline)
$100Mcatalytic funding called for, to kick-start national plans
60%of countries to have funded national AMR action plans by 2030
70%of human antibiotic use to come from WHO's safer “Access” group by 2030

The declaration also commits countries to meaningfully reduce antimicrobial use in agriculture, strengthen surveillance and infection prevention, and establish an independent panel to track evidence and progress — loosely modelled on the IPCC's role for climate change.

The machinery behind the targets

WHO Global Action Plan (2015)

The foundational blueprint. It set five pillars — awareness, surveillance, infection prevention, optimised antimicrobial use, and sustainable investment in new tools — and required every country to write a national action plan. Most countries now have one; the persistent weakness is that many plans are unfunded and unimplemented, which is exactly what the 2024 “funded plans” target attacks.

GLASS: measuring the problem (2015)

WHO's Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System collects standardised resistance and consumption data from well over 100 countries, turning anecdotes into trend lines. Surveillance is the unglamorous backbone of the response: without it, no one knows which drugs still work where, or whether policies are succeeding.

AWaRe: a traffic-light system for antibiotics

WHO classifies antibiotics into Access (first-choice, narrow-spectrum drugs that should be widely available), Watch (broader-spectrum drugs to use more selectively), and Reserve (last-resort drugs to protect fiercely). The global target that at least 70% of human antibiotic consumption should be Access-group drugs gives every health system a simple, measurable stewardship goal.

One Health: joining up humans, animals and environment

Because resistance circulates freely between people, animals, food and ecosystems, four multilateral agencies — WHO, FAO (food and agriculture), WOAH (animal health) and UNEP (environment) — now coordinate as the “Quadripartite”. Concrete wins on the agriculture side include the EU's bans on growth promoters (2006) and routine preventive farm use (2022), and falling farm antibiotic sales in Europe; the challenge is extending this to the fast-growing livestock economies of Asia, Africa and the Americas.

Money for new weapons

Because the commercial market for antibiotics is broken (see Causes), a patchwork of public and philanthropic mechanisms now funds development:

Honest scorecard: what's working, what isn't

Sources for this page

  • UN General Assembly, “Political Declaration of the High-level Meeting on Antimicrobial Resistance”, September 2024 — un.org
  • WHO, “World leaders commit to decisive action on antimicrobial resistance”, 26 September 2024 — who.int/news
  • Health Policy Watch, “World Leaders Approve Milestone Commitment To Reduce Deaths From Antibiotic Resistance By 10% By 2030”, 2024 — healthpolicy-watch.news
  • WHO, “Global Action Plan on AMR” (2015), “GLASS reports”, “AWaRe classification” — who.int
  • CARB-X (carb-x.org), GARDP (gardp.org), AMR Action Fund (amractionfund.com)